Re: [PATCH 10/10] firewire-net: Adjust checks for null pointers in five functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 18 SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> The script "checkpatch.pl" can point information out like the following.

A side note:  checkpatch.pl is for authors to help prepare their
submissions of new code (or their refactoring of existing code if for some
reason a refactoring is undertaken).

> Comparison to NULL could be written !…

Yes it could, or it could remain as is.  Both styles are used in
drivers/firewire/net.c, so it is indeed preferable to normalize it to one
of them.  I keep your patch for the next occasion when related work is
being done on drivers/firewire/net.c or drivers/firewire.

> Thus fix the affected source code places.

It is not a "fix", it is a stylistic change.

> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/firewire/net.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firewire/net.c b/drivers/firewire/net.c
> index eb7ce5e..e313be3 100644
> --- a/drivers/firewire/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/firewire/net.c
> @@ -366,13 +366,13 @@ static struct fwnet_partial_datagram *fwnet_pd_new(struct net_device *net,
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->fi_list);
>  	fi = fwnet_frag_new(new, frag_off, frag_len);
> -	if (fi == NULL)
> +	if (!fi)
>  		goto free_new;
[...]
-- 
Stefan Richter
-======----- =--= ==---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux