Re: [PATCH] SCSI-aic94xx: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "kmem_cache_destroy"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:14:52 +0100
> 
> The kmem_cache_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the calls is not needed.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c
> index 662b232..ab93049 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_init.c
> @@ -660,12 +660,9 @@ Err:
>  
>  static void asd_destroy_global_caches(void)
>  {
> -	if (asd_dma_token_cache)
> -		kmem_cache_destroy(asd_dma_token_cache);
> +	kmem_cache_destroy(asd_dma_token_cache);
>  	asd_dma_token_cache = NULL;
> -
> -	if (asd_ascb_cache)
> -		kmem_cache_destroy(asd_ascb_cache);
> +	kmem_cache_destroy(asd_ascb_cache);
>  	asd_ascb_cache = NULL;
>  }
>  
> 

How do you think about to integrate this update suggestion
into another source code repository?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux