On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 21:38 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > Some prefer that source code be "templatized" regardless > > of the number of exit points that any particular use of a > > specific function type. [] > > Some of your patches are converting these templatized > > functions to a different form for no added value. > > Would you like to distinguish a bit more between my evolving > collection of update suggestions and the concrete proposal > for the function "nicvf_register_interrupts"? No. > > These patches make the local source code inconsistent > > and generally goes against the authors preferred style. > > Which programming approach will be the leading one here finally? Whatever the developer wants. There is no _best_ or _only_ style for this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
