On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Move the jump label directly before the desired log statement > >> so that the variable "ret" will not be checked once more > >> after a function call. > > > > This commit message fits with the previous change. > > Do you prefer an other wording? Something like "Split the return into success and error cases, to avoid the need for testing before logging." The concept of the return being duplicated didn't come across in your message. > > It could be nice to put a blank line before the error handling code. > > Is it really a coding style requirement to insert another blank line between > the suggested placement of the statement "return 0;" and the jump label? I don't think it is a requirement. But some files do it, and if other functions in this file do it, then it would be nice to do the same. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
