From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:57:34 +0100 (CET) >> > Would it be preferable to remove the macro entirely and inline the for >> > loop header? >> >> Could you show me an example of how this would look exactly? > > One possible solution is below. I moved the initialization of the nh > pointer inside the loop to reduce the size of the loop header. One could > also inline fi->fib_nh[nhsel] where it occurs, but it seemed that that > would make quite long expressions. Personally I like the explicit named iterator. It is descriptive and tells that we are walking over all of the nexthops for a route. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
