Hi Julia,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-rmobile.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-rmobile.c
>> > @@ -313,8 +313,10 @@ static int __init rmobile_add_pm_domains(void __iomem *base,
>> > }
>> >
>> > pd = kzalloc(sizeof(*pd), GFP_KERNEL);
>> > - if (!pd)
>> > + if (!pd) {
>> > + of_node_put(np);
>> > return -ENOMEM;
>> > + }
>>
>> While technically this patch is correct, the system will be dead anyway if it
>> ever goes OOM at core_initcall() time.
>
> Maybe it would be better for the code to be correct to serve as an example
> (or to avoid serving as a bad example) for others?
Sure, as it's only a single call, that's fine for me.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
