On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Julia,
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-rmobile.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-rmobile.c
> > @@ -313,8 +313,10 @@ static int __init rmobile_add_pm_domains(void __iomem *base,
> > }
> >
> > pd = kzalloc(sizeof(*pd), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!pd)
> > + if (!pd) {
> > + of_node_put(np);
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
>
> While technically this patch is correct, the system will be dead anyway if it
> ever goes OOM at core_initcall() time.
Maybe it would be better for the code to be correct to serve as an example
(or to avoid serving as a bad example) for others?
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
