Thanks for review, my answers inline On 01-07-2015 12:27, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:05:45AM +0530, Sohny Thomas wrote:FIX 2 unnecessary braces found by checkpatch.pl Signed-off-by: Sohny Thomas <sohnythomas@xxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c index d5ad017..f3674de 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/virtpci/virtpci.c @@ -190,9 +190,10 @@ static int write_vbus_chp_info(struct spar_vbus_channel_protocol *chan, return -1; off = sizeof(struct channel_header) + chan->hdr_info.chp_info_offset; - if (chan->hdr_info.chp_info_offset == 0) { + + if (chan->hdr_info.chp_info_offset == 0) return -1; - } +why you are inserting new line here?
I did it so that its readable, will remove it if not required
I did this so that the code is more readable and understandable, I checked and checkpatch didn't call this out , so its clean.memcpy(((u8 *)(chan)) + off, info, sizeof(*info)); return 0; } @@ -484,10 +485,10 @@ static int delete_vhba(struct del_virt_guestpart *delparams) i = virtpci_device_del(NULL /*no parent bus */, VIRTHBA_TYPE, &scsi.wwnn, NULL); - if (i) { + if (i) return 1; - } - return 0; + else + return 0;No, now this will introduce a new checkpatch warning that "else is not required after return". why did you introduce this "else"?
Otherwise the above code looks like this if(i) return 1; return 0;
regards sudip
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
