Re: platform: x86: Deletion of checks before backlight_device_unregister()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> There is no way for a human being to remember the complete list of
> functions with sanity checks and which don't have sanity checks.

I understand also this software development challenge.


> Markus has introduced quite a few bugs as well

I have only found other opinions about specific update suggestions.
Which of such "bugs" are real mistakes?
Are you looking for a better consensus?


> (people have so far managed to catch his bugs before they were committed).

Would you like to refer to any concrete software developers?


> He so far has resisted any suggestion that he should manually review
> his patches before sending them.

I am performing source code review to some degree.
My approach does partly not fit to your expectations.

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux