On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:25:45AM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Hi Simon, Dan, > > On 10/04/2015 16:30, Simon Guinot wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:30:41AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> Static checkers complain that "timers[i].delay_on" is an unsigned long > >> but we're writing to only 32 bits of it. The code works on 32 bit > >> systems and little endian 64 bit systems so it doesn't cause a problem > >> in practise but it's still better to silence the warning. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Note that your patch applies on the top of a patch "leds: netxbig: add > > device tree binding" which has not been merged yet by Bryan. For now, > > this patch only sits in the mvebu/for-next branch for testing purpose. > > And it is still not clear to me in which tree the patch will go. That's > > why I think you should resend your patch to the mvebu maintainers (added > > in Cc) on the LAKML. Probably they will be interested in merging your > > clean-up patch in the mvebu/for-next branch as well. > > Actually the reason to get all the series in mvebu/for-next was to be > confident enough to make a pull request as soon as the driver part was > acked by the maintainer. Unfortunately it didn't occur until now and > the merge windows for arm-soc is now closed so it won't be part of > v4.1 (at least the mvebu related part). Hi Gregory, Thanks for your efforts. I'll try again with v4.2 ... Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
