Re: [patch] perf/x86/intel/pt: cleanup error handling in pt_pmu_hw_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > 2) Exit labels bad associations because code which uses err: or out:
> > >    labels is often buggy as we have seen in pt_event_add().
> > 
> > Not if the cleanup path is robustly constructed. Multiple labels can 
> > also be used:
> > 
> >   - if performance is of concern
> >   - if we need to unroll layers of taken locks
> 
> A cascade of labels helps the reader understand what goes with what, 
> in what order, because functions are not called when they are not 
> needed.

I certainly agree for complex init/teardown sequences that are 
non-trivial to clean up.

For the specific case of kfree() in init paths it's also a valid model 
to just auto-cleanup everything in the failure path, to simplify 
things. (which I did here.)

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux