On 04/09, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Put NULL test on the result of the previous call instead on one of its > > arguments. A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this > > problem is as follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/): > > > > // <smpl> > > r@ > > expression *e1; > > expression *e2; > > identifier f; > > statement S1,S2; > > @@ > > > > e1 = f(...,e2,...); > > ( > > if (e1 == NULL || ...) S1 else S2 > > | > > *if (e2 == NULL || ...) S1 else S2 > > ) > > // </smpl> > > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> > > Yep that's a bug: > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks. Applied to clk-next. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
