On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 07:14:46PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > On Dec 13 2014 16:04, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 02:06:59PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > >> On Dec 13 2014 04:27, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >>> This code tends to use unsigned variables by default and it causes > >>> signedness bugs when we use negative variables for error handling. > >>> The "i" and "j" variables are used to iterated over small positive > >>> values and so they should be type "int". The "len" variable doesn't > >>> *need* to be signed but it should be signed to make the code easier to > >>> read and audit. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Thanks, but I prefer to use 'unsigned int' for loop counter, like the > >> other drivers. > > > > Unthinking use of unsigned int every where is a kind of leprosy. It > > just makes the code hard to read and it causes bugs. > > In the beginning of last year, I received a comment from Clemens to use > 'unsigned int' type for loop counter instead of 'int' type. Since then, > for ALSA firewire stack, I've been following his advice. (but actually I > missed to OXFW driver...) > > For consistency inner this stack, I request you to follow this. > That's nonsense advice. How many bugs has it prevented? It causes a lot. Whatever, just fix it and give me the reported-by tag. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
