>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c?id=fc14f9c1272f62c3e8d01300f52467c0d9af50f9#n268 > > I think static functions can be named whatever > the developer chooses. I agree also that this implementation detail is correct in principle. Is a renaming of such identifiers feasible so that the probability of other name clashes can be reduced and corresponding static source code analysis might become a bit easier? How do you prefer to handle name space issues? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
