On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 15:14 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> 2. Are any additional prefixes appropriate so that further name space > >> conflicts can be better avoided? > > > > To avoid possible external naming conflicts, add tb_ prefix to > > various ring_<foo> structs and functions. > > Do you imagine that any XEN software developers need also to reconsider > this implementation detail? > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c?id=fc14f9c1272f62c3e8d01300f52467c0d9af50f9#n268 I think static functions can be named whatever the developer chooses. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
