> > This is especially true if you have trained yourself to know that > > free_netdev() can't accept NULL pointers. > > Do you need to adjust your concerns a bit over time when function variants > provide a corresponding safety check in their implementations? There would not seem to be any _need_ to do so. An unnecessary null test is always safe. The only real problem that I can see with an unnecessary null test in error handling code (intrinsically not critical performance wise) is if it gives the illusion that a value can be null when it cannot. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
