On 11/12/2014 06:03 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Hello Lendacky, Thomas, The patch c5aa9e3b8156: "amd-xgbe: Initial AMD 10GbE platform driver" from Jun 5, 2014, leads to the following Smatch warning: drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-dev.c:1633 xgbe_dev_read() warn: we tested 'err' before and it was 'true' drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-dev.c 1628 /* Check for errors (only valid in last descriptor) */ 1629 err = XGMAC_GET_BITS_LE(rdesc->desc3, RX_NORMAL_DESC3, ES); 1630 etlt = XGMAC_GET_BITS_LE(rdesc->desc3, RX_NORMAL_DESC3, ETLT); 1631 DBGPR(" err=%u, etlt=%#x\n", err, etlt); 1632 1633 if (!err || (err && !etlt)) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Smatch is saying that we could re-write this as: if (!err || !etlt) { Which is true, but I'm not sure if that was really the original intent of the code. If it was then maybe we could make it more explicit by
The original intent is to handle the case where err is zero (no error) or err is one but etlt is zero (no error, even though err is one). I'll step back a bit and try to see what looks best. I'm leaning towards the Smatch suggestion and I'll just add a comment explaining it. Thanks, Tom
saying: if (etlt = 0x00) { /* do nothing */ } else if (!err) { if (etlt == 0x09 && ... } else { if (etlt == 0x05 || etlt == 0x06) ... 1634 if ((etlt == 0x09) && 1635 (netdev->features & NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX)) { 1636 XGMAC_SET_BITS(packet->attributes, RX_PACKET_ATTRIBUTES, 1637 VLAN_CTAG, 1); 1638 packet->vlan_ctag = XGMAC_GET_BITS_LE(rdesc->desc0, 1639 RX_NORMAL_DESC0, 1640 OVT); 1641 DBGPR(" vlan-ctag=0x%04x\n", packet->vlan_ctag); 1642 } 1643 } else { 1644 if ((etlt == 0x05) || (etlt == 0x06)) 1645 XGMAC_SET_BITS(packet->attributes, RX_PACKET_ATTRIBUTES, 1646 CSUM_DONE, 0); 1647 else 1648 XGMAC_SET_BITS(packet->errors, RX_PACKET_ERRORS, 1649 FRAME, 1); 1650 } 1651 regards, dan carpenter
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html