Re: [patch 2/2] staging: lustre: validate size in ll_setxattr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

On Oct 22, 2014, at 6:32 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> In that case, size == 0 seems to be the wrong value size for an lov param
>> as well.
> I don't know about this.  The code is very clear that size == 0 is
> acceptable inside the if statement.  Oleg?

I am not sure what if statement do you mean?
If it's the "if ((strncmp(name, XATTR_TRUSTED_PREFIX," one then size of 0
does seem to be incorrect:

                struct lov_user_md *lump = (struct lov_user_md *)value; 
// (I hope this is not a user pointer?)
…
                if (lump != NULL && lump->lmm_stripe_offset == 0)
                        lump->lmm_stripe_offset = -1;
// So, if lump is 0, we are already accessing past allowed range
…
                        int lum_size = (lump->lmm_magic == LOV_USER_MAGIC_V1) ?
and again…

Bye,
    Oleg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux