Re: [patch 2/2] staging: lustre: validate size in ll_setxattr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:27:08PM +0400, Andrew Perepechko wrote:
> Hi Dan!
> 
> You probably meant putting that check after the followring if-statement,
> since generic extended attributes can have size 1, 2, 3, ...
> 

Ok.

> In that case, size == 0 seems to be the wrong value size for an lov param
> as well.

I don't know about this.  The code is very clear that size == 0 is
acceptable inside the if statement.  Oleg?

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux