Re: [PATCH 4/11] use ether_addr_equal_64bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > > I'm just thinking of a programmer, e.g. changing a struct like this:
> > > > 
> > > >  struct foo {
> > > >    u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
> > > > -  u16 dummy;
> > > >  };
> 
> I don't know of a way to catch that.
> Anyone else?

Well, one could have a semantic patch that checks for that.  But the 
problem is that it is very slow, and it only covers the cases that I can 
transform automatically, which currently means no pointers, only explicit 
arrays.

On the other hand, I am finding the structure definition, so I can easily 
update the structure definition with an appropriate comment.

struct foo {
    u8 addr[ETH_ALEN]; /* must be followed by two bytes in the structure */
    u16 dummy;
};

Unfortunately it is kind of verbose.  Could there be an attribute?  That 
could even easily be checked.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux