> Seems to be missing an "iwlwifi:" or so prefix, but I guess we can add
> it when we take the patch ...
Sorry. Not sure why that happened. I'll look into it.
> Is there any way we could catch (sparse, or some other script?) that
> struct reorganising won't break the condition needed ("within a
> structure that contains at least two more bytes")?
What kind of reorganizing could happen? Do you mean that the programmer
might do at some time in the future, or something the compiler might do?
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
