At Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:09:47 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:48:08AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:09:54 +0300, > > Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > > > > There is a 2 byte hole after "info.func_nr" so we could leak unitialized > > > stack information to userspace. > > > > > > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ('Linux-2.6.12-rc2') > > > > Does this help at all? It means that the bug has been there even > > before moving to git. I think it's better to be removed for avoid > > confusion. > > I think if you are back porting it then you know it goes back all the > way. That seems useful. Yeah, I understand the usefulness of the tag. But my understanding is that this is used for pointing a regression point. However, in this particular case, the commit you pointed there isn't the actual commit introducing the bug. It's the genesis commit containing everything. > The Fixes tag is still new so it's not totally clear what the rules are. > I don't have strong feelings about this either way. OK, then let me drop that tag in this case. thanks, Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html