On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 15:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:11:18 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Andrew? Do you want to handle patches for defects that > > are both obvious _and_ trivial? > > I look at everything! Well, I guess I'll have to start cc'ing you on the trivial in case the eyestrain gets to you. [] > I somewhat disagree that even > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2833648/ was trivial. It changes > the format of kernel logs and might have implications for people who > are parsing those logs. I think there are _very_ few instances where dmesg output should be kept constant for scrapers. The format of an oops is about the only one I can think of where it's reasonable to do so. > one needs to read each and every > conversion and decide on the risk factor. Enjoy... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
