On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 16:49 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On 08/20/2013 03:14:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 15:02 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > > On 08/19/2013 04:27:17 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 23:22 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This is a 7 line patch that corrects logging defects that has > > had > > > > no > > > > > > reply from you for the last month. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2833648/ > > > > > > > > > > This hasn't missed any Linus' major release, as it has been > > > > submitted post > > > > > 3.11 merge, right? (hint, that was Jul 4th). > > > > > > > > > > If this would miss *next* major Linus' release, I would accept > > your > > > > > complaints. But this is definitely not the case. > > > > > > > > You're suggesting this patch, which corrects obvious > > > > defects, should miss 3.12 and go into 3.13? > > > > > > > > I think that's wrong. > > > > > > Correcting obvious defects, which can't wait a release, is "trivial" > > > now, is it? > > > > Rob, how do you suggest this obvious and trivial > > patch be handled? > > Obvious != trivial. They're orthogonal. Silly. Some things are both obvious _and_ trivial. > > Send 6+ 1 line patches that do the same thing to > > individual maintainers? > > If it's important send it to Andrew Morton. Andrew? Do you want to handle patches for defects that are both obvious _and_ trivial? > If it's trivial it's not time critical. If it's time critical it's not > trivial. We disagree on the definition of trivial. Trivial can also mean simple and immediately evident. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
