On Friday 09 August 2013 08:24 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 08:15 +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
On Friday 09 August 2013 08:09 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
And, maybe it'd be better to use IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE
instead of 0.
I tried googling what to replace IRQF_DISABLED with but found nothing.
In the patch fixed earlier (not by me) it was replaced with 0 so i did
same. But from now on I'll use IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE. Thanks
Maybe that's not the right thing to do.
0 is what's almost exclusively used.
IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE is only used a few times.
It's also a lot longer.
Sorry to poke back. But just want to confirm. I should use
IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE and not 0 right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
