On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 07:54 +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
> On Friday 09 August 2013 03:03 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 14:20 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> So what's the problem again? :-)
> I'm quite new to kernel development. I saw in one of the patches which
> fixes IRQF_DISABLED issue by removing so i did.
Hi Kumar.
No worries, welcome.
> > Wouldn't it be better to do a sed 's/IRQF_DISABLED/0/' instead?
> > Maybe Kumar wants to/is doing that?
> Yes i wanted to do the same and i retrieved list of all programs
> containing IRQF_DISABLED but i didn't wanted to send all of them in one
> patch. I would be sending them for one program in one patch.
You should definitely not send a single patch.
$ git grep -w --name-only IRQF_DISABLED | wc -l
245
I think that's way too many modified files for a
single patch.
If you do it, please remember to change bits like
"(IRQF_<foo> | IRQF_DISABLED)" so that instead of
"(IRQF_<foo> | 0)", you use just "IRQF_<foo>".
And, maybe it'd be better to use IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE
instead of 0.
Perhaps you could send patches bundled together
in sensible chunks, say, second level directories.
Something like:
$ git grep -w --name-only IRQF_DISABLED | cut -f1,2 -d"/" | uniq -c
1 Documentation/PCI
3 Documentation/scsi
62 arch/arm
1 arch/avr32
14 arch/cris
4 arch/frv
4 arch/h8300
5 arch/ia64
1 arch/m32r
7 arch/m68k
1 arch/microblaze
4 arch/mn10300
1 arch/score
2 arch/sparc
6 arch/x86
5 drivers/block
2 drivers/bus
1 drivers/cdrom
7 drivers/char
12 drivers/clocksource
1 drivers/crypto
5 drivers/dma
3 drivers/edac
2 drivers/isdn
21 drivers/media
2 drivers/misc
3 drivers/mtd
28 drivers/net
1 drivers/pnp
24 drivers/scsi
1 drivers/staging
2 drivers/tty
3 drivers/usb
2 drivers/w1
2 drivers/xen
1 include/linux
1 include/net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
