From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:31:31 +0100 (BST) > On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:20:08 +0300 >> >> > There is a typo here, "i" vs "j", so we would crash on module_exit(). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Please always explicitly state the tree for which a patch is >> applicable. >> >> Here I figured it out by trial an error, trying to apply it >> to 'net' (where it failed) and then 'net-next' (where it >> applied cleanly). >> >> I should never have to play patch monkey games like that, you >> need to tell me where a patch is targetted. > > Shouldn't one always, by default, work on linux-next? Bug fixes, especially serious ones, should be targetted at 'net'. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
