On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, David Miller wrote: > From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:20:08 +0300 > > > There is a typo here, "i" vs "j", so we would crash on module_exit(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Please always explicitly state the tree for which a patch is > applicable. > > Here I figured it out by trial an error, trying to apply it > to 'net' (where it failed) and then 'net-next' (where it > applied cleanly). > > I should never have to play patch monkey games like that, you > need to tell me where a patch is targetted. Shouldn't one always, by default, work on linux-next? julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
