On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 10:27:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 08:15:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > [] > > >> What about another patch (that I guess should go first) that converts > >> printk to dev_* or pr_*? > > > Huh, what? Those are two totally unrelated things. Emil's patch is > > a bug fix. > > To be precise his patch is bugfix and cleanup at once. > My proposal is to add a clean up patch. The printk idea isn't a bad one, it's just totally unrelated to what the patch is doing. You can't just randomly tell people to do a bunch of work for no reason. "Good bugfix, but before we apply it you have to mow my lawn." regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
