The "+" operation has higher precedence than "?:" and ->msi_cap is always non-zero here so the original statement is equivalent to: entry->mask_pos = PCI_MSI_MASK_64; Which wasn't the intent. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c index d40bed7..2c10752 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c @@ -563,8 +563,10 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec) entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq; /* Save IOAPIC IRQ */ entry->msi_attrib.pos = dev->msi_cap; - entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) ? - PCI_MSI_MASK_64 : PCI_MSI_MASK_32; + if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) + entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64; + else + entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32; /* All MSIs are unmasked by default, Mask them all */ if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit) pci_read_config_dword(dev, entry->mask_pos, &entry->masked); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
