On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:20:19AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > We should unlock here and do some cleanup before returning. > > > > We can't actually hit this return path with the current code, so this > > patch is a basically a cleanup and doesn't change how the code works. > > Why keep the return path then? If the code is there, someone reading it > could naturally assume that it is necessary. There are sanity checks in vb2_queue_init() but this caller always passes a sane "pd->q" pointer so the sanity checks always succeed. That might change in later code. ;) I like the code as it is, but I just wanted to note that the impact of this patch is zero in case anyone was backporting fixes. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
