On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We should unlock here and do some cleanup before returning. > > We can't actually hit this return path with the current code, so this > patch is a basically a cleanup and doesn't change how the code works. Why keep the return path then? If the code is there, someone reading it could naturally assume that it is necessary. julia > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/dt3155v4l/dt3155v4l.c b/drivers/staging/media/dt3155v4l/dt3155v4l.c > index 073b3b3..3da17bc 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/dt3155v4l/dt3155v4l.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/dt3155v4l/dt3155v4l.c > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ dt3155_open(struct file *filp) > pd->field_count = 0; > ret = vb2_queue_init(pd->q); > if (ret < 0) > - return ret; > + goto err_free_q; > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pd->dmaq); > spin_lock_init(&pd->lock); > /* disable all irqs, clear all irq flags */ > @@ -407,11 +407,11 @@ dt3155_open(struct file *filp) > ret = request_irq(pd->pdev->irq, dt3155_irq_handler_even, > IRQF_SHARED, DT3155_NAME, pd); > if (ret) > - goto err_request_irq; > + goto err_free_q; > } > pd->users++; > return 0; /* success */ > -err_request_irq: > +err_free_q: > kfree(pd->q); > pd->q = NULL; > err_alloc_queue: > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
