Re: [PATCH 2/4] drivers: android: binder: Fix code style

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 00:54 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:31:53PM +0100, Mirsal Ennaime wrote:
> > @@ -2943,28 +2944,39 @@ static void binder_deferred_release(struct binder_proc *proc)
> >  
> >  	threads = 0;
> >  	active_transactions = 0;
> > +
> 
> The blank line here isn't really appropriate.  The initialization is
> logically a part of the loop.  It's part of the same paragraph.
> 
> >  	while ((n = rb_first(&proc->threads))) {
> > -		struct binder_thread *thread = rb_entry(n, struct binder_thread, rb_node);
> > +		struct binder_thread *thread = rb_entry(n,
> > +			struct binder_thread,
> > +			rb_node);
> 
> Do this instead:
> 		struct binder_thread *thread;
> 
> 		thread = rb_entry(n, struct binder_thread, rb_node);
> 
> > +
> >  		threads++;
> >  		active_transactions += binder_free_thread(proc, thread);
> >  	}
> > +
> >  	nodes = 0;
> >  	incoming_refs = 0;
> > +
> >  	while ((n = rb_first(&proc->nodes))) {
> > -		struct binder_node *node = rb_entry(n, struct binder_node, rb_node);
> > +		struct binder_node *node = rb_entry(n,
> > +			struct binder_node,
> > +			rb_node);
> >  
> 
> Same thing again.

Resending, thank you so much for reviewing this!

All the best,

-- 
mirsal 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux