Re: [PATCH 2/4] drivers: android: binder: Fix code style

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:31:53PM +0100, Mirsal Ennaime wrote:
> @@ -2943,28 +2944,39 @@ static void binder_deferred_release(struct binder_proc *proc)
>  
>  	threads = 0;
>  	active_transactions = 0;
> +

The blank line here isn't really appropriate.  The initialization is
logically a part of the loop.  It's part of the same paragraph.

>  	while ((n = rb_first(&proc->threads))) {
> -		struct binder_thread *thread = rb_entry(n, struct binder_thread, rb_node);
> +		struct binder_thread *thread = rb_entry(n,
> +			struct binder_thread,
> +			rb_node);

Do this instead:
		struct binder_thread *thread;

		thread = rb_entry(n, struct binder_thread, rb_node);

> +
>  		threads++;
>  		active_transactions += binder_free_thread(proc, thread);
>  	}
> +
>  	nodes = 0;
>  	incoming_refs = 0;
> +
>  	while ((n = rb_first(&proc->nodes))) {
> -		struct binder_node *node = rb_entry(n, struct binder_node, rb_node);
> +		struct binder_node *node = rb_entry(n,
> +			struct binder_node,
> +			rb_node);
>  

Same thing again.

regards,
dan carpenter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux