On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:23:52PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:18:20PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Good idea. I can do the summary if the too many reports are a problem > > for the list. > > I would do fine with the summary as well. Perhaps if I could add a > procmail filter so it would go into its own mailbox. I would modify > my scripts to grep for the error before sending a dublicate report. That's definitely a good use of the summary. :) > The thing about the reports are that it's not actually anything that > janitors can help out with. Normally it's in some tree that no one > has and the author takes care of the fix. Good point. I'll remove kernel-janitors from the CC list. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
