Re: [next:akpm 26/413] kernel/sys.c:1868:14: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:06:38 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:19:34AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:05:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > -	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, addr, sizeof(addr)) || addr < mmap_min_addr)
> > > > +	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, (void *)addr, sizeof(addr)) || addr < mmap_min_addr)
> > > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > >  
> > > >  	error = -EINVAL;
> > > 
> > > It should have the __user tag as well, methinks?
> > > 
> > > --- a/kernel/sys.c~prctl-use-access_ok-instead-of-task_size-in-prctl_set_mm-fix-fix
> > > +++ a/kernel/sys.c
> > > @@ -1865,7 +1865,8 @@ static int prctl_set_mm(int opt, unsigne
> > >  	if (opt == PR_SET_MM_EXE_FILE)
> > >  		return prctl_set_mm_exe_file(mm, (unsigned int)addr);
> > >  
> > > -	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, (void *)addr, sizeof(addr)) || addr < mmap_min_addr)
> > > +	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, (void __user *)addr, sizeof(addr)) ||
> 
> I would have expected sizeof(*addr) except addr is unsigned long.
> To me sizeof(unsigned long) would be clearer.

Well, we're setting a boundary here so what *is* the correct size? 
zero?  maximum possible vm space?

I think I'll drop the patch, pending some clear thinking ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux