On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 08:07:58AM -0700, Dan Carpenter wrote:
[...]
> > for (j=0; j <= i ;j++ ) {
> ^^^^^^
> The count up loops are prone to the exact same off by one bugs. ;)
> You've got one in your sample code. Plus I'd have to declare
> another variable and send a v2 patch and I am very lazy... So in
> this case I think should just take my original patch.
Applied, thank you!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
