On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Michael, > > FYI, there are new compile warnings show up in > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git queue > head: 879238fecc051d95037ae76332916209a7770709 > commit: 9fc77441e5e1bf80b794cc546d2243ee9f4afb75 [41/42] KVM: make processes waiting on vcpu mutex killable > config: s390-defconfig > > All error/warnings: > > arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c: In function 'kvm_s390_handle_wait': > arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:428:12: warning: ignoring return value of 'vcpu_load', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result] > > vim +428 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c > 418 add_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait); > 419 while (list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.list) && > 420 list_empty(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->list) && > 421 (!vcpu->arch.local_int.timer_due) && > 422 !signal_pending(current)) { > 423 set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > 424 spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock); > 425 spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock); > 426 vcpu_put(vcpu); > 427 schedule(); > > 428 vcpu_load(vcpu); > 429 spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock); > 430 spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock); > 431 } > 432 __unset_cpu_idle(vcpu); > 433 __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > 434 remove_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait); > 435 spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock); > 436 spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock); > 437 hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&vcpu->arch.ckc_timer); > 438 return 0; Thanks for the report. This is because vcpu_load can now fail if task is being killed. I'm guessing the following is the right fix but have no way to tell. Warning: completely untested. ---> kvm/arm: handle vcpu_load failure gracefully Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> -- diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c index b7bc1aa..5aedf25 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c @@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_wait(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { u64 now, sltime; DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); + int ret; vcpu->stat.exit_wait_state++; if (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu)) @@ -407,7 +408,9 @@ no_timer: spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock); vcpu_put(vcpu); schedule(); - vcpu_load(vcpu); + ret = vcpu_load(vcpu); + if (ret) + goto cancel; spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock); spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock); } @@ -416,6 +419,7 @@ no_timer: remove_wait_queue(&vcpu->arch.local_int.wq, &wait); spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock); spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.local_int.float_int->lock); +cancel: hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&vcpu->arch.ckc_timer); return 0; } > --- > 0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Centre > Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html