Re: [Xen-devel] [patch 3/3] xen/privcmd: remove const modifier from declaration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/09/12 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 08.09.12 at 11:58, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When we use this pointer, we cast away the const modifier and modify the
>> data.  I think it was an accident to declare it as const.
> 
> NAK - the const is very valid here, as the v2 interface (as opposed
> to the v1 one) does _not_ modify this array (or if it does, it's a
> bug). This is a guarantee made to user mode, so it should also be
> expressed that way in the interface.
> 
> But of course the cast used before this patch isn't right either, as
> it indeed inappropriately discards the qualifier. Afaiu this was done
> to simplify the internal workings of the code, but I don't think it's
> desirable to sacrifice type safety for implementation simplicity.

m.arr here isn't const as m is really the V1 structure where m.arr is
non-const.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux