> > Easy enough, the patch that fixes it is the last one in the series that I sent in yesterday. > > I don't understand. That is the patch series that Fengguang was testing > afaik. His tests were on > > tree: git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git devel > head: 5c13c9e1c15ee2ca9ab2b953224001af53d9be09 > > which includes your patch series from yesterday, no? Trond, I typically do commit-by-commit tests and will complain if *any* point of the tree is not bisect-able. A fix at the HEAD won't stop the email notification for a defect in the middle point.. On the other hand, I do maintain a list of non-rebaseable tree/branches, on which the HEAD commit will be tested first, and only if any problems are found, go back to find out the first bad commit. If you prefer the latter behavior, I can add your tree or any branch of it to the non-rebaseable list. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
