RE: [nfs:devel 46/51] fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of 'nfs_commit_inode'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bryan,

Why did you switch to using IS_ENABLED in the first place, and why wasn't that put in a separate patch?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fengguang Wu [mailto:fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:43 PM
> To: Schumaker, Bryan
> Cc: kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Myklebust, Trond; linux-
> nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [nfs:devel 46/51] fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of
> 'nfs_commit_inode'
> 
> Hi Bryan,
> 
> Kernel build failed on
> 
> tree:   git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git devel
> head:   5c13c9e1c15ee2ca9ab2b953224001af53d9be09
> commit: 1c606fb74c758beafd98cbad9a9133eadeec2371 [46/51] NFS: Convert
> v3 into a module
> config: blackfin-BF533-EZKIT_defconfig (attached as .config)
> 
> All related error/warning messages:
> 
> fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of 'nfs_commit_inode'
> In file included from fs/nfs/write.c:19:0:
> include/linux/nfs_fs.h:547:1: note: previous definition of 'nfs_commit_inode'
> was here
> 
> vim +1592 fs/nfs/write.c
>   1589		return status;
>   1590	}
>   1591
> > 1592	int nfs_commit_inode(struct inode *inode, int how)
>   1593	{
>   1594		LIST_HEAD(head);
>   1595		struct nfs_commit_info cinfo;
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel build testing backend         Open Source Technology Centre
> Fengguang Wu <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>                     Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux