Bryan, Why did you switch to using IS_ENABLED in the first place, and why wasn't that put in a separate patch? > -----Original Message----- > From: Fengguang Wu [mailto:fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:43 PM > To: Schumaker, Bryan > Cc: kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Myklebust, Trond; linux- > nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [nfs:devel 46/51] fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of > 'nfs_commit_inode' > > Hi Bryan, > > Kernel build failed on > > tree: git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git devel > head: 5c13c9e1c15ee2ca9ab2b953224001af53d9be09 > commit: 1c606fb74c758beafd98cbad9a9133eadeec2371 [46/51] NFS: Convert > v3 into a module > config: blackfin-BF533-EZKIT_defconfig (attached as .config) > > All related error/warning messages: > > fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of 'nfs_commit_inode' > In file included from fs/nfs/write.c:19:0: > include/linux/nfs_fs.h:547:1: note: previous definition of 'nfs_commit_inode' > was here > > vim +1592 fs/nfs/write.c > 1589 return status; > 1590 } > 1591 > > 1592 int nfs_commit_inode(struct inode *inode, int how) > 1593 { > 1594 LIST_HEAD(head); > 1595 struct nfs_commit_info cinfo; > > --- > 0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Centre > Fengguang Wu <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
