On 06/11/2012 07:42 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > On 10.06.2012 19:52, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >> On 06/09/2012 05:56 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>> (CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY & CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK) is (0x02 & 0x01) which >>> is zero so the condition is never true. The intent here was to test >>> that both flags were set. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> This is a static checker fix. I'm not super familiar with the c_can >>> code. >> >> Good catch. Applied to can-next. >> >> Marc >> > > > Shouldn't this fix go through the net-tree and stable instead of net-next? Indeed. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
