On 10.06.2012 19:52, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 06/09/2012 05:56 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> (CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY & CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK) is (0x02 & 0x01) which >> is zero so the condition is never true. The intent here was to test >> that both flags were set. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> This is a static checker fix. I'm not super familiar with the c_can >> code. > > Good catch. Applied to can-next. > > Marc > Shouldn't this fix go through the net-tree and stable instead of net-next? Regards, Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
