On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Emil Goode <emilgoode@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Please disregard my previous patch. > I missed the comment saying "0 is a valid user pointer". The comment could be changed to "NULL", though. --Andy > > Best regards, > Emil Goode > > On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 01:59 +0200, Emil Goode wrote: >> This patch silences the following sparse warning: >> arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c:250:34: >> warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer >> >> Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <emilgoode@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c >> index f386dc4..6170ff9 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c >> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address) >> >> ret = sys_getcpu((unsigned __user *)regs->di, >> (unsigned __user *)regs->si, >> - 0); >> + NULL); >> break; >> } >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
