Please disregard my previous patch. I missed the comment saying "0 is a valid user pointer". Best regards, Emil Goode On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 01:59 +0200, Emil Goode wrote: > This patch silences the following sparse warning: > arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c:250:34: > warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer > > Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <emilgoode@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c > index f386dc4..6170ff9 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c > @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address) > > ret = sys_getcpu((unsigned __user *)regs->di, > (unsigned __user *)regs->si, > - 0); > + NULL); > break; > } > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
