Re: [patch] blkcg: change a spin_lock() to spin_lock_irq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-03-29 20:51, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch complains that we re-enable IRQs twice.  It looks like we forgot
> to disable them here on the spin_trylock() failure path.  This was added
> in 9f13ef678e "blkcg: use double locking instead of RCU for blkg
> synchronization".

Thanks, that is indeed a screwup. Fix applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux