[patch] blkcg: change a spin_lock() to spin_lock_irq()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Smatch complains that we re-enable IRQs twice.  It looks like we forgot
to disable them here on the spin_trylock() failure path.  This was added
in 9f13ef678e "blkcg: use double locking instead of RCU for blkg
synchronization".

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c
index 74a76a8..bf4b76e 100644
--- a/block/blk-cgroup.c
+++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c
@@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ static int blkiocg_pre_destroy(struct cgroup *cgroup)
 		} else {
 			spin_unlock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
 			cpu_relax();
-			spin_lock(&blkcg->lock);
+			spin_lock_irq(&blkcg->lock);
 		}
 	}
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux