On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 06:44:25PM +0530, santosh nayak wrote: > From: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@xxxxxxxxx> > > Instead of "in_atomic()", we can use in_interrupt() to check whether > its an interrupt context. What are you trying to fix? Your description is an example of a bad commit comment. It merely describes the change, which anyone can see by looking at the diff. What it totally and utterly fails to do is to describe _why_ the change is necessary or what the problem is. So, until it does, this patch gets a definite NAK. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
