[patch] xfrm6: remove unneeded NULL check in __xfrm6_output()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We don't check for NULL consistently in __xfrm6_output().  If "x" were
NULL here it would lead to an OOPs later.  I asked Steffen Klassert
about this and he suggested that we remove the NULL check.

On 10/29/11, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
>>    148	
>>    149		if ((x && x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL) &&
>>                           ^
>
> x can't be null here. It would be a bug if __xfrm6_output() is called
> without a xfrm_state attached to the skb. I think we can just remove
> this null check.

Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
index 4eeff89..8755a30 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int __xfrm6_output(struct sk_buff *skb)
 		return -EMSGSIZE;
 	}
 
-	if ((x && x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL) &&
+	if (x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL &&
 	    ((skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) ||
 		dst_allfrag(skb_dst(skb)))) {
 			return ip6_fragment(skb, x->outer_mode->afinfo->output_finish);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux