Re: [patch] cipso: remove an unneeded NULL check in cipso_v4_doi_add()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:55:49 AM Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 05:20:11PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > -       if (doi_def == NULL || doi_def->doi == CIPSO_V4_DOI_UNKNOWN)
> > > +       if (doi_def->doi == CIPSO_V4_DOI_UNKNOWN)
> > >                goto doi_add_return;
> > >        for (iter = 0; iter < CIPSO_V4_TAG_MAXCNT; iter++) {
> > >                switch (doi_def->tags[iter]) {
> > 
> > I'd prefer to keep the NULL check in there as it does afford a little
> > bit of extra safety and this is management code after all, not
> > per-packet processing code, so the extra check should have no
> > observable performance impact.
> 
> The dereferences on the lines before mean we would Oops before
> reaching the check ...

Thanks for pointing that out, I missed that when looking at your patch.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux